I think no `<= lfun exists. There is a manual page at

http://pike.lysator.liu.se/generated/manual/modref/ex/lfun_3A_3A.html

which lists all of them.


On 08/27/14 09:47, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> It appears that when Pike is presented with a comparison like:
> 
>  a<=b
> 
> And given the availability of `< and `<= and `== operators, it insists
> on using `< first, and if that fails it uses `==.
> Instead of using merely `<= directly.
> 
> Am I missing something here or is that a missed optimisation?
> 

  • `&l... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Arne Goedeke
      • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
        • ... Arne Goedeke
    • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum

Reply via email to