>> Indeed, I agree! PHP was where I started and the user contributions in the >> PHP doc was priceless. We could solve that with Disqus >> (https://disqus.com/). Just jack in some JS when the refdoc is being run on >> pike.lysator.liu.se. I’ve already done that with Google Custom Search: >> > > The big problem with user contributions in docs is that the quality > varies from "good enough to turn appalling docs into something you can > actually use" to "flat-out wrong and horrendously misleading". Is > someone going to vet all posts and make sure they're on the better > side of the scale?
Indeed. I guess moderators (i'm volunteering) would be happy to fix those. Actually, the main drawback is not to have sample Pike code at all, rather than having some sub-optimal one. -- Bertrand LUPART
