On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: >>before calling gtk_object_destroy. Any idea why? Is there a situation >>in which destroy() might have been called with arguments, such that it >>shouldn't actually destroy anything? > > I can only guess, but maybe it was being called explictly from some > places in the code with a dummy argument to distinguish it from the > real _destruct() called by Pike internals.
Hmm. I can't find any, but that doesn't necessarily prove it. I'll keep an eye out for inexplicable GTK widget destruction as a potential clue. ChrisA
