Hello,
>> As a side note, maybe the brew Pike formula could be enhanced to >> provide mktestsuite in the PATH ? > > I'm not sure what the best solution is for this; "mktestsuite" is kind of a > generic name. Maybe we could add an option to test_pike to generate the > testsuite? Getting back some attention about this subject. The process of generating testsuite files from testsuites.in ones would look like more consistent to me if invoked from pike -x something However, I understand this testsuite stuff is compile-time-Pike-centric (makefile and such), and I’m looking for something more run-time'ish, that would test your own Pike module against a pre-installed Pike interpreter. 1- testsuite.in file are distributed alongside own Pike module code 2- on the system likely to run the module, pike -x something runs the tests (and probably need to generate/update testsuite files on the fly) Are testsuite suited for that, or should i look elsewhere ? Pest [1] comes to mind Thank you, Bertrand [1] https://github.com/poppa/pest
