On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 20:39, <"\"Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum\" <[email protected]>"@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > Hi Chris. > > > In Pike 8 (tested on 8.1.15), the implicit lambda correctly receives > > its __ARGS__, and will happily provide those as closure variables. In > > Pike 9 (tested with current master, 235eb5), the inner function > > somehow causes __ARGS__ to be 0 instead of an array. > > > > Any ideas as to what's going on here? Am I misusing implicit lambdas? > > Thanks for the report and testcase. > > Fixed in Pike master as of a few minutes ago.
Thanks! Late to the response since this message landed in my spambox, silly Gmail. Hopefully won't happen in the future. Confirmed fixed. Appreciate it! ChrisA
