> This is a very non-flattering article and doesn't make us look too good, > IMO. A lot of it is from incorrect statements also. I would have expected > to see this on a WinCE site more than a Linux news site. I've "corrected" Michael in a private email, and he promised to print a correction/update in this week's edition. /d _______________________________________________ Pilot-unix mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hcirisc.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/pilot-unix
- LWN coverage of pilot-link status Paolo Amoroso
- Re: LWN coverage of pilot-link status David A. Desrosiers
- Re: LWN coverage of pilot-link status Chris Riddoch
- Re: LWN coverage of pilot-link status vsync
- Re: LWN coverage of pilot-link status Chris Riddoch
- Re: LWN coverage of pilot-link status Judd Montgomery
- David A. Desrosiers