Hey all again — I should have mentioned this new proposal along side my last one about project-level requirements, but it is really stand-alone in some sense. I proposed that we make it possible to install Pinax via PyPI. That will work as-is today, but there is one minor nit. We are putting PINAX_ROOT/apps on the sys.path which is horrible leakage for a package. I propose we move to referencing the apps by their full import path from the pinax package. There are clearly use cases for the current behavior, but if we don't remove that requirement we will have a poorly designed package that requires this stupid requirement ;-)
I am perfectly okay with trade-offs being made for moving it to the full path. Does anyone else have thoughts? Brian Rosner http://oebfare.com http://twitter.com/brosner -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pinax Core Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en.
