I should add that I'm willing to *remove* stuff in 0.9 alpha 1 that we plan to add back (improved) in a second alpha.
James On Jul 18, 2010, at 7:34 PM, James Tauber wrote: > I would REALLY like to get a 0.9 alpha 1 out the door as soon as possible. I > had hoped for one before my OSCON talk on Wednesday. > > I think 0.9dev is much better than 0.7.1 so I'd much rather have people > trying out the latest code. I know people can go to github for that but > having a released alpha version would help a lot and would show all the great > progress we've made in the last 10 months. > > Looking at the original release criteria in ROADMAP, the main thing from > there that's missing is the settings refactor. I'm willing to skip that for > alpha 1. > > Now there are some project refactorings that Brian Rosner, Patrick Altman and > myself have been working on recently. I'm not exactly sure what the latest > status of those is, but I think they could be finished off fairly easily > (Brian, correct me if I'm wrong). We were also in the midst of a change of > the wiki app to wakawaka. > > So my proposal is that we finish off the project refactor and the wiki work > and then test the result as a candidate for 0.9 alpha 1. > > Thoughts? > > James > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pinax Core Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pinax Core Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en.
