well, I am sorry too about so many messages per second.
------------------
Andy Schmitt wrote 'it's only a tool."
well, most of the time what we discuss here? our tools, isn't it?
meggan gould wrote:
"it is getting one's hands dirty, just in a different way."
thanks for your enlightment, meggan.
what differences are these is what I tried to discuss a bit, but it
seems I got myself all wrongly interpreted. excuse me if I sounded like
saying this is better than that, I never meant that. it is ridiculous.
I was just trying to say that pixels have a quite different nature than
silver cristals. they generate image through a totally new way and this
is worth a thinking. it is indeed just a tool, just another subject.
but it is a subject to me as much as a closeup pinhole camera or a
contact printing alt processs under acrylic/perspex/plexiglass, somehow
it manages to get more passion into it, hate and love.
at last, films, papers, wet plates are also highly technological
products, don't miss this point, please.
[]s
luish
Lisa Reddig wrote:
Sorry, Sorry, Sorry
We all should just stick our tongues out and say "my mommy's better than
your mommy".
The end
Lisa
my pinholes cooler than yours
