Meggan what is your website name? www.meggould.net doesn't seem to come up. thanks andy
-----Original Message----- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???????]On Behalf Of Meggan Gould Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:15 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] digital pinholes bretton-- i have done quite a few digital pinholes, but the only way i figured out to do it feasibly was with a digital slr (i used a canon d30), and taking the lens off, i used a coke can-converted to pinhole lens cap....this worked quite well, but definitely NOT without pixels. i have a few on my website www.meggould.net....i ended up making big enlargements with these (A3 and bigger), and the pixels are impressively large, as the cameras aren't really designed for long exposures (mine were mostly around 10 seconds), making images with lots of noise. problem with 4 x 5 back in a ready-made pinhole 4 x 5 back is the light-tight-ness, as the digital backs have a scanning arm-device thing, and the dowels to keep the film holder in place are definitely not compatible. something could certainly be rigged up though, i imagine. though i don't know of any that has the possibility of a long exposure either.... meggan _______________________________________________ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???????/discussion/
