I agree with the file sizes Rob but you can get some fantastic archival prints digitally. But this is another thing, perhaps publication Alexis
on 11/1/02 5:28 pm, R Duarte at ra...@rahji.com wrote: > good idea, but the photos will look pretty bad when printed unless they're > scanned/uploaded/downloaded/printed at really high resolution (which means > big file sizes). personally, i'd rather see silver prints in a gallery than > printouts but maybe i'm just being a baby. :) > rob > >> From: "Chris" <chri...@worldnet.att.net> >> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:15:14 -0600 >> To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Combine new with old >> >> Instead of one set of travelling photos for the exhibition, why not upload >> the photos then download and print them wherever anyone wants to mount an >> exhibition? Combine old school with new school. I think that format is an >> artisitc expression in itself. Has there ever been a simultaneous >> multi-venue photo exhibition? This could be the first and to do it with >> pinhole photographs would be the ultimate in irony. >> >> Chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >> unsubscribe or change your account at >> http://www.???????/discussion/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???????/discussion/
