With regard to the Polacolor 59 film, I think Tom already answered the question...but I've used this film a lot, and it definitely has a real problem with color, specifically when the exposure times get the least bit lengthy (more than 2 seconds!). This film also tends to have a blueish/greenish cast--no matter what. Whenever I use it, I use an orange filter, which solves that problem. And, as with any Polaroid film, be sure and check the expiration date. Polaroid really means it.. Hope this helps.
--Diana pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? wrote: > Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to > pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > pinhole-discussion-request@p at ??????? > > You can reach the person managing the list at > pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE:zoneplate / pinhole camera (Martin White (FOA ILTL)) > 2. Polacolor 59 in a pinhole camera (ethereal art) > 3. Re: Polacolor 59 in a pinhole camera (Tom Lindsay) > 4. [Fwd: "51" Caddy] (Tom Lindsay) > 5. OOps (Tom Lindsay) > 6. Re: OOps (Jarred McCaffrey) > 7. Re: OOps (Tom Lindsay) > 8. New York meeting (ska...@aol.com) > 9. New images (Thomas Harvey) > 10. Re: New images (Jeff Spirer) > 11. RE: Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. (Soren Svensson) > 12. RE: Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. (Jeff Spirer) > 13. RE: Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. (Soren Svensson) > 14. Re: New images (echinis...@gmx.de) > 15. Re: New images (echinis...@gmx.de) > 16. new image (pinholeren...@netscape.net) > 17. Re: New images (Richard M. Koolish) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Martin White (FOA ILTL)" <ms.wh...@auckland.ac.nz> > To: "'pinhole-discussion@p at ???????'" <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:10:49 +1300 > charset="iso-8859-1" > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] RE:zoneplate / pinhole camera > > -----Original Message----- > From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? > -----Original Message----- > There's a site I've seen with a 4x5 camera with a zone plate and a pinhole . > Price $349. zone plate = .23mm pinole .010" > www.qualitycamera.com Is this the one that was being requested? > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > -- __--__-- > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 14:59:31 +0100 (WET DST) > From: Pedro Goncalves <p...@mega.ist.utl.pt> > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re:[pinhole discussion] portuguese > photographers > > Hi, emma... > > Replying to your email on portuguese photography museums...here is one > you may find interesting... > > Instituto Portugues de Fotografia > R. Damasceno Monteiro, 154-A > Tel: (351) 21 816 51 30 > > ...One other thing, when looking in search engines, my personal advice. > use www.google.com > This is no advertising, but that search engine really works! > > ------------------------- > Pedro Goncalves : p...@rnl.ist.utl.pt > > [The original message follows...] > >hi > >can any one help? > > >I am interested in finding websites (in english) of any photography > >musuems within Portugal . > > >Can any give recomend anything? > >search engines so far have found nothing usefull. > > >I would be very grateful for any help. > >Thankyou > >emma > > -- __--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 00:59:27 -0400 (EDT) > From: Mark D Roberts <mrobe...@pb.seflin.org> > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Cc: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > > Sometime ago someone posted a message with the address of a Zone > Plate/Pinhole camera maker. > I'm trying to find the site, I found it, but lost it when my computer > crashed. > It was not a Finney, but it was wood & sold for about $389.00. > Can anyone help me???? > Thanking you in advance, > > Mark > > Mark D Roberts > mrobe...@pbfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us > > -- __--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: Dieter Bublitz <dieter.bubl...@bingo-ev.de> > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:46:32 +0200 > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > Mark, > > try http://www.zeroimage.com > > Maybe this is what you are looking for. > > Dieter > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 00:59:27 -0400 (EDT), Mark D Roberts > <mrobe...@pb.seflin.org> wrote: > > >Sometime ago someone posted a message with the address of a Zone=20 > >Plate/Pinhole camera maker. > >I'm trying to find the site, I found it, but lost it when my computer=20 > >crashed. > >It was not a Finney, but it was wood & sold for about $389.00. > >Can anyone help me???? > >Thanking you in advance,=20 > > > >Mark > > > > --=20 > Dieter's Lochkamera Seite: http://www.bingo-ev.de/~db106/index.htm > Lochkamera-FAQ: http://www.bingo-ev.de/~db106/faq.htm > > -- __--__-- > > Message: 7 > From: brockha...@aol.com > Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 09:02:50 EDT > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > -- __--__-- > > Message: 8 > From: "William Erickson" <erick...@ic.mankato.mn.us> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:32:48 -0500 > charset="iso-8859-1" > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > This may not be what you're after, but Pinhole resource sells 4x5 pinhole or > zoneplate leonardo models. Calumet photo.com lists a finney turret on a > lensboard for ZoneVI view camera. I don't know any source for a combined > pihole/zone plate camera that doesn't use Finney's turret. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mark D Roberts <mrobe...@pb.seflin.org> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Cc: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 11:59 PM > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > > > Sometime ago someone posted a message with the address of a Zone > > Plate/Pinhole camera maker. > > I'm trying to find the site, I found it, but lost it when my computer > > crashed. > > It was not a Finney, but it was wood & sold for about $389.00. > > Can anyone help me???? > > Thanking you in advance, > > > > Mark > > > > > > Mark D Roberts > > mrobe...@pbfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > > > -- __--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > End of Pinhole-Discussion > Digest_______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "ethereal art" <ethereal...@mindspring.com> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:26:43 -0400 > charset="utf-7" > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Polacolor 59 in a pinhole camera > > +AD4-By the way, has anyone experimented with Polacolor 59 4x5 sheet film in > +AD4-a > pinhole camera? I have obtained good results using it in my press +AD4-camera > but haven't had good results in my pinhole camera. Does it not +AD4-work with > extended exposure times? Any input in this area would also +AD4-be welcome. > +AD4-Thanks > +AD4-Sincerely, > +AD4-Andrew Sias > > Try turning your press camera into a pinhole camera... Make life easy+ACE- > Rosanne > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:57:57 -0400 > From: Tom Lindsay <tlind...@erols.com> > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polacolor 59 in a pinhole camera > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > Rosanne, > > Go to a commercial studio lighting company and ask them for a "Lee filters" > swatch book > of the gels they use for lighting. The swatch book will have just about every > filter > you could experiment with. > I shot some Polacolor 59 a long time ago and noticed that it did need > filtering, as > almost everything had a bluish tint. Thinking about it now I'd use a filter > that would > change your image by at least half using the Tungsten conversion filter; > don't worry > they are all marked. Play with the more yellow- yellow gold filters. Another > cool thing > about the swatch book is that you can take a shot, let it develop and then > look through > the filters at the photo until it looks right; and that's the filter to use. > It's like > using filters to print color; that is if you've ever done that. > Another cool thing to do is take some of the filter swatches out of the book > and cover > a flash for a 35 mm camera; like a Vivitar 283. When you do this you can > paint with > light in the early evening or even night. > I hope this helps. > > "Keep on Pinholin'", > Tom > > ethereal art wrote: > > > +AD4-By the way, has anyone experimented with Polacolor 59 4x5 sheet film > > in +AD4-a > > pinhole camera? I have obtained good results using it in my press > > +AD4-camera > > but haven't had good results in my pinhole camera. Does it not +AD4-work > > with > > extended exposure times? Any input in this area would also +AD4-be welcome. > > +AD4-Thanks > > +AD4-Sincerely, > > +AD4-Andrew Sias > > > > Try turning your press camera into a pinhole camera... Make life easy+ACE- > > Rosanne > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:04:30 -0400 > From: Tom Lindsay <tlind...@erols.com> > To: "pinhole-discussion@p at ???????" <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > boundary="------------0180C9CD1735616C1904E267" > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] [Fwd: "51" Caddy] > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --------------0180C9CD1735616C1904E267 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > --------------0180C9CD1735616C1904E267 > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 > Message-ID: <39f4d50a.7a5b8...@erols.com> > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:17:14 -0400 > From: Tom Lindsay <tlind...@erols.com> > Reply-To: tlind...@erols.com > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U) > X-Accept-Language: en > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: "discussion-list@p at ???????" <discussion-list@p at ???????> > Subject: "51" Caddy > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hello All, > > I'm still out there doing pinhole!!! I drive past this "51 Caddy" almost > everyday on my way to radiation my treatments for tonsillary cancer; and > now the old girl is up for sale. I'm not going to buy it or anything > like that, but I felt like it needed to be immortalized in pinhole; the > fall colors really set it off. > > "Keep on Pinholin'", > Tom > > --------------0180C9CD1735616C1904E267-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:18:40 -0400 > From: Tom Lindsay <tlind...@erols.com> > To: "pinhole-discussion@p at ???????" <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] OOps > > Hello All, > > I forgot to tell you where to see the "51" Caddy. It's on the > disscussion/upload list. > > "Keep on Pinholin'", > Tom > > P.S. If someone would tell me how to do this the "correct" way I'd sure > appreciate it. Because I see other peoples URLs to their uploads and > wasn't quite sure what to do? > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:22:40 -0400 > From: Jarred McCaffrey <jmcca...@cs.uml.edu> > Organization: University of Massachusetts > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] OOps > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > just type in the url exactly the way it is in your browser. Cut and paste > is easiest. For example: > > http://www.yahoo.com > > I typed in exactly "http://www.yahoo.com"; and your mail reader is smart > enough to realize it should be a link to a website. > > Hope this helps! > > Jarred McCaffrey > > Tom Lindsay wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I forgot to tell you where to see the "51" Caddy. It's on the > > disscussion/upload list. > > > > "Keep on Pinholin'", > > Tom > > > > P.S. If someone would tell me how to do this the "correct" way I'd sure > > appreciate it. Because I see other peoples URLs to their uploads and > > wasn't quite sure what to do? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:27:21 -0400 > From: Tom Lindsay <tlind...@erols.com> > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] OOps > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > Jarred, > > Thanks! > "Keep on Pinholin'", > Tom > > Jarred McCaffrey wrote: > > > just type in the url exactly the way it is in your browser. Cut and paste > > is easiest. For example: > > > > http://www.yahoo.com > > > > I typed in exactly "http://www.yahoo.com"; and your mail reader is smart > > enough to realize it should be a link to a website. > > > > Hope this helps! > > > > Jarred McCaffrey > > > > Tom Lindsay wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I forgot to tell you where to see the "51" Caddy. It's on the > > > disscussion/upload list. > > > > > > "Keep on Pinholin'", > > > Tom > > > > > > P.S. If someone would tell me how to do this the "correct" way I'd sure > > > appreciate it. Because I see other peoples URLs to their uploads and > > > wasn't quite sure what to do? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > From: ska...@aol.com > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 23:11:44 EDT > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] New York meeting > > Hi all, > I'm a photographer from Kansas City working in pinhole. I'll be in New York > Oct 27th to Nov. 5th.and would like to get together with other pinholers. > There was a New York Meeting at the Met several years ago which I could not > attend. Is any one interested in getting together again? The afternoon of > Sunday, October 29 would work the best for me. > > Kathy Tracy > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:22:46 -0700 > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > From: Thomas Harvey <harv...@mail.aracnet.com> > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] New images > > I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were > taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding > front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front. > I think the focal length is about 19mm. > > Tom > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/PolesPin.jpg > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:30:53 -0700 > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > From: Jeff Spirer <j...@spirer.com> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images > <10825513.972269914691.javamail.im...@knuckles.excite.com> > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > At 09:22 PM 10/23/00, Thomas Harvey wrote: > >I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were taken > >with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding front door and > >bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front. I think the focal > >length is about 19mm. > > > >Tom > > > >http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg > > > >http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/PolesPin.jpg > > Two excellent shots! I especially like the second, it's like reaching for > god or something... > > Jeff Spirer > Photos: http://www.spirer.com > One People: http://www.onepeople.com/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > From: "Soren Svensson" <li...@turbomx5.com> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:16:17 -0700 > charset="us-ascii" > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > I'm seriously considering buying the Zero 2000 and I think there are some > people on this list that have and I would like to get some input from you. > > Is the camera as good as it looks on the website? > How about fit and finish? > Would you recommend it? > Is it worth the price? > > I did find some strange data on the site. According to the specifications, > it has a focal length of 1" (25.4 mm) and that would give a 130 degree > diagonal angle of view. > Well, I may have calculated something wrong, but a 1" focal length on a 6x6 > neg is 115 degrees. And even if you stretch it out to the claimed image > circle, it's still only 119 degrees. Even the claimed horizontal and > vertical angle doesn't match, 95.45 against a calculated 96.6 (OK, not a big > difference but it bugs me that it doesn't match). > > Well, one of us must have made a mistake and I hope it's me, otherwise I > don't know if I can trust the rest of this camera :-) > > Here's the formula I used: > > a = (90-asin(f/D))*2 > > a -> Diagonal angle > f -> focal length (25.4 mm claimed in specs) > D -> Distance from pinhole to corner of neg > (47.6 mm for a 57x57 mm neg at 1" focal length) > > Regards > Soren > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? > > [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???????]On Behalf Of Dieter Bublitz > > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 11:47 PM > > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > > > > > > Mark, > > > > try http://www.zeroimage.com > > > > Maybe this is what you are looking for. > > > > Dieter > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 00:59:27 -0400 (EDT), Mark D Roberts > > <mrobe...@pb.seflin.org> wrote: > > > > >Sometime ago someone posted a message with the address of a Zone > > >Plate/Pinhole camera maker. > > >I'm trying to find the site, I found it, but lost it when my computer > > >crashed. > > >It was not a Finney, but it was wood & sold for about $389.00. > > >Can anyone help me???? > > >Thanking you in advance, > > > > > >Mark > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dieter's Lochkamera Seite: http://www.bingo-ev.de/~db106/index.htm > > Lochkamera-FAQ: http://www.bingo-ev.de/~db106/faq.htm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:27:35 -0700 > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > From: Jeff Spirer <j...@spirer.com> > Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > At 10:16 PM 10/23/00, Soren Svensson wrote: > >I'm seriously considering buying the Zero 2000 and I think there are some > >people on this list that have and I would like to get some input from you. > > > >Is the camera as good as it looks on the website? > > If you're talking about it's appearance, yes, at least until you use it > enough. Mine no longer looks at all like that. > > If you're talking about how it works, it does what it's supposed to do. > > >How about fit and finish? > > There isn't much to discuss there, but the wind knob isn't geared and it's > not all that smooth, but that's not a big deal. The back fits reasonably > well for a wood-to-wood connection. > > One thing that makes me crazy, and it's not the fault of the Zero 2000, is > the red window for frame number. I can't see the markings on Tri-X and end > up with about eight shots a roll. Afga film is much better marked, at > least if you're looking through the red window. (Agfa also mint flavors > the backing end you lick, yummy.) > > >Would you recommend it? > > Absolutely. > > >Is it worth the price? > > That depends on how you feel about the price. The manufacturer sells it > cheaper, but Pinhole Resource is here in the US and easy to talk to by > phone (plus they use one of my photos to promote it.) > > But it's definitely a quality product, and it's easy to use. Some of the > lower price pinhole cameras don't have tripod sockets, a real problem with > those ten minute exposures. If you prefer roll film to sheet, it's a > pretty good choice. > > >I did find some strange data on the site. According to the specifications, > >it has a focal length of 1" (25.4 mm) and that would give a 130 degree > >diagonal angle of view. > > This was followed by a lot of math. I don't really know about the data, it > seems fairly wide to me. > > It gets quite a bit of flare in the daylight, which can be sort of > interesting, like in this photo - > http://www.spirer.com/images/sunflower.jpg. And just for fun, here's > another one I posted to the list a while ago - > http://www.spirer.com/images/shrine.jpg. > > Cheers, > > Jeff Spirer > Photos: http://www.spirer.com > One People: http://www.onepeople.com/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > From: "Soren Svensson" <li...@turbomx5.com> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Zone Plate/Pinhole camera. > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:53:16 -0700 > charset="us-ascii" > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > > There isn't much to discuss there, but the wind knob isn't geared > > and it's > > not all that smooth, but that's not a big deal. The back fits reasonably > > well for a wood-to-wood connection. > > Thanks for the good info. > I do have a follow-up question though. > > Right now I have a 6x9 Lochkamera > (http://www.pinholeresource.com/products.html#lochkamera) and the film > winding drives me nuts. > If I don't secure the winding-knobs with rubber bands, they wind up as soon > as I let go of them. And even if I use rubber bands, the film does not get > winded (sp?) tightly. In fact, it's usually so lose that I get light damage > at the edges of the film when I take the film out of the camera. > > How would you say that the Zero 2000 performs in this respect? > > Regards > Soren > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:35:50 +0200 (MEST) > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images > From: echinis...@gmx.de > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > > I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were > > taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding > > front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front. > > I think the focal length is about 19mm. > > what do you mean : 'ripped out'? (sorry, non-anglophone) > > > > > Tom > > > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg > > > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/PolesPin.jpg > > great shots! > > keep on > > martin > > -- > Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:35:49 +0200 (MEST) > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images > From: echinis...@gmx.de > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > > I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were > > taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding > > front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front. > > I think the focal length is about 19mm. > > what do you mean : 'ripped out'? (sorry, non-anglophone) > > > > > Tom > > > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg > > > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/PolesPin.jpg > > great shots! > > keep on > > martin > > -- > Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net > > --__--__-- > > Message: 16 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:33:01 -0400 > From: pinholeren...@netscape.net > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] new image > > I have been having a hard time getting any usable images from my finney - > then this one popped out . > > http://imagehost.auctionwatch.com/bin/viewimage.x/001071f3/grays/pinhole1.JPG > > chip renner > > --__--__-- > > Message: 17 > From: "Richard M. Koolish" <kool...@bbn.com> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 100 08:47:46 -0400 (EDT) > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg > > Is that a real working sundial? And where is it? > And would you mind if I sent a note about your picture to the > sundial mailing list? > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > End of Pinhole-Discussion > Digest_______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/
