Richard, Is the resolution we see exactly what the scanner gave you? Seems pretty low, too digital.
I loved #3. I'm into water and boats these days. Leslie --- Richard Heather <rheat...@slonet.org> wrote: > Hi. I just bought a UMAX 2200. It will sca 81/2x11 > prints or up to 4x5 > transparencies. Works good for B&W negs if they are > not too dense. > Doesnt really have the resolution for 35mm but 2 > 1/4x2 1/4 is pretty > good. It is supposed to do 42bit color and 12 bit > B&W but I havn't been > able to make mine work. > I just uploaded new images from my new Leonardo 3" > sacnned by the UMAX > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/upload/images/. > Look for: > rheather1,2,3,4 > Richard Heather > > Jeff Dilcher wrote: > > > >Hello! > > > > > >I was thinking of upgrading my scanner, and was > > >hoping to get a unit that might be capable of > > >scanning 4x5 (b&w) negatives. Does such a thing > exist? > > >Are other people here scanning negatives to > > >create positive "prints" for web pages? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???????/discussion/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
