Hello! While libdirac (C++) is the slower reference implementation meant for research, libschroedinger (C) is written from scratch and optimized for speed. As decoder, only libschroedinger is used. So I think only libschroedinger should be used in Pitivi, or libdirac should be marked as "slow research" or whatever. Greets, Kai
> In pitivi, we have both diracenc and shroenc showing up as "Dirac" in > the video codecs list (the full descriptive name would be "Dirac > Encoder" for both, but we strip out redundant words such as "Encoder"). > > According to what I've been told on #gstreamer, the difference is that > one is based on libschroedinger, one on libdirac from the BBC; both > encode the Dirac video format. > > The question is, what should we do about this on the pitivi side (if > anything)? > Manually hide one of them? File a bug in gst requesting that the names > be more differentiated? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1_______________________________________________ > Pitivi-pitivi mailing list > Pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Pitivi-pitivi mailing list Pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi
