Hello!
I think it's an ideologic question, but I would choose VP8 and make a
preview with speed=2 and the end-rendering with speed=0. For quality
rate you have to try, because it also depends on your input data (Maybe
start with 6 for the "ugly" and go down to "3.5" for the nice one?).
But also Theora would be good enough for preview. I just can recommend
the use of Matroska (MKV) and Vorbis.
Greets,
Kai

Am 25.09.2011 01:43, schrieb Tom Roche:
> summary: New video editor (and new pitivi user) needs rendering parameters for
>
> * quick-and-dirty proof-of-concept
> * high-quality for public presentation
>
> details:
>
> I've never done video editing before, and only some crude audio editing (just 
> cropping talks). Fortunately I only needed to crop some bits (no transitions 
> necessary) out of an online MP4, which I was able to accomplish pretty 
> speedily after `sudo aptitude install pitivi` (on a Mint box) and a bit of 
> reading of the "manual." I now have a 45-min version of an original that was 
> ~90 min (and 400 MB). At least, I now have that in pitivi ...
>
> But now I want to first view my output in a "real" video player (e.g., vlc) 
> and to send to others (most either windows or mac users) for previewing. 
> Ultimately I want to show this video on a large monitor at an upcoming public 
> meeting, so I chose what seemed to me to be reasonable rendering parameters: 
> video=XGA, audio=CD, and container=mp4mux (taking the container defaults of 
> lamemp3enc and schroenc). This produced a render time=20 hrs (I'm also doing 
> this on fairly lowend hardware), so I decided I should do a quick-and-dirty 
> proof-of-concept first. I chose video=QVGA and twiddled the audio and 
> container parameters to favor performance over quality, until I got a render 
> time=2 hrs, which seemed reasonable.
>
> I came back 2 hrs later and the render was indeed done. But when I tried to 
> play the output MP4 in vlc, I got only the audio. So I'm wondering, how to do 
> this right? I.e. how to produce
>
> * a quick (render time <= 4 hrs) and small (file size < 1 GB) render
>   of the video, suitable for me to check my work and to send to
>   meeting organizers for preview.
>
> * a high-quality, size-is-no-object version for presentation
>   (hopefully requiring less than a day to render).
>
> I.e., what parameters should I choose in Render project>Modify for each of 
> these usecases? If more information is desired, please don't hesitate to ask. 
> And if I should R some FM, please point me to the appropriate place.
>
> TIA, Tom Roche <tom_ro...@pobox.com>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
> _______________________________________________
> Pitivi-pitivi mailing list
> Pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Pitivi-pitivi mailing list
Pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi

Reply via email to