> Can you elaborate a bit on what this change is meant to fix? It looks like > you are trying to support the case where the user has escaped the '@' or '%' > characters and has not provided a base location or resource dictionary, > respectively, but I want to confirm. > > yes.. i arrived at this looking into an exception raised in figuring out data binding
when the exception preempts arbitrarily, then the more telling exception is not raised later in the process where the fault is more particular /john/
