> Also, a quick Google search reveals that there is no documented standard > convention for naming JAR files. So, any so-called standard would be de > facto. I don't have a problem adhering to a de facto standard - I just don't > think we've established that there actually is one. :-)
If you're really asking for a list of Java library distributions to tally how many include version numbers in the JARs and how many don't, then you're welcome to come up with such a list. I have looked, and there appeared to be a de facto standard, but each member of this list can do their own research and cast their vote.
