> - Maven requires you to put the version in your jar file name. They enforce > this for the obvious reason: you are 99% sure which version you are running > and whether or not you might need to upgrade to a new version if one is > available. The 'only-directory contains a version number' is flawed because > I can still drop in any version of a pivot jar without even knowing that the > wrong version is in place.
If we launch an apache release without version numbers in the JAR files, does that then preclude us from deploying the 1.1 release through Maven?
