On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Todd Volkert <[email protected]> wrote:
> * servlet-api.jar: > We build against this to produce pivot-web.server.jar, which contains > our server portion of our "web queries" API. Specifically, it > contains a few servlets, which require that J2EE jar to build. No problems. You can even include the version available from the Tomcat (or is it Geronimo) projects as source code, modify it to your hearts desire. > * junit.jar > We've written a few JUnit unit tests in the core-test package, and we > plan to write more in other packages. This jar allows us to build our > tests, which end up as pivot-core.test.jar, etc. The resulting jars > are not part of our API - just our test cases. JUnit is licensed > under the "common public license": > http://junit.sourceforge.net/cpl-v10.html CPL is classified as Category B. That means that depending on its binary, and including a pre-built binary in the distribution is kosher. Deriving anything from its sources is not. > * plugin.jar > This jar is part of Sun's JRE (but doesn't live in the CLASSPATH by > default) and allows us to build against the LiveConnect API > (netscape.javascript.*). We use this in pivot-wtk.jar to provide our > component-DOM interaction API. This is too generic name for me to locate with Google. Can you provide me with URL to the source of this. > * stax-api.jar > We build pivot-wtk.jar against this to provide our WTKXSerializer > (which translates our XML bean representation into objects). It's > homepage is http://stax.codehaus.org/, and it looks like it's Apache > 2.0, so we should be good. Yes, it is good, and you are good. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
