> Just a drive-by observation: could you run rat [1] on the release and > publish the report along with the release? This will check for obvious > licensing issues in your code base. Publishing the rat report will > make the lives of your reviewers so much simpler.
FYI Martijn, when you look at the RAT reports and cast your vote, note that there are three classifications of files in the reports that are without license headers: 1) Eclipse project files, like .classpath and .project. These should obviously not contain license headers. 2) package.html (Javadoc) files. Likewise 3) Resource files (.json). Likewise. -T
