Hi Is there a reason that the demos can't be relicensed to the Apache license?
I found them extremely valuable in getting up to speed, and it's a nuisance for new people to checkout code from multiple sources. Regards, Noel. Todd Volkert wrote: > All: > > For those of you not on the [email protected] or > [email protected] lists, there has been an active discussion > today about whether it is OK to keep code in your subversion > repository that is not apache-license-friendly. The gist is that it > is recommended not to do so, and if you decide to forego that > recommendation, it is strongly recommended that you segregate such > code away from the compliant code within your SVN hierarchy. > > As such, I've made the following changes: > > * I've migrated our demos out of the repository -- they now live at > http://code.google.com/p/pivot-demos/. I've added you all to that > sub-project, so you should have write access to that repository. If > you don't, let me know. > > * I've migrated the JFreeChart provider out of the repository -- it > now lives at http://code.google.com/p/pivot-jfree/. Again, I've added > you all to that sub-project. > > We're hoping to get the JFreeChart provider eventually integrated > directly into JFreeChart itself (Greg is discussing this with the > owner of JFreeChart), so that was always destined to go away. As for > the demos, some could have stayed without any issues, but it seemed > cleaner to just migrate them all, thus freeing us from any future > licensing worries when writing demos. > > All this really means to you is that if you want to work on a demo or > the JFreeChart provider, you'll need to checkout from those other > repositories. Everything in the main repository still builds as it > always did - just without demos. > > Let me know if you have any questions, > -T >
