I verified that Eclipse handles them just fine, so there's really no harm in including the headers. We have to check in any changes to those files when they change, so when we do, it'll be our responsibility to keep the license header in there just as we do with our source files...
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand the thinking behind this change, but I'm wondering if it is a) > necessary and b) workable. Those files are generated and managed by Eclipse - > there's no guarantee that they won't be completely regenerated, minus > comments, the next time they change. > > Mentors - are we going overboard by trying to include headers in absolutely > everything (such as IDE-generated configuration files)? To me, this seems a > bit excessive. > > > >
