-0 I don't think it's worth fighting if it's going to hinder approval by the Apache overlords, but I frankly prefer the current convention.
Christopher Brind wrote: > +1 > > > 2009/6/5 Greg Brown <[email protected]> > > >> It has been proposed that we align our package naming conventions with Java >> and Apache standards and rename "pivot.*" to "org.apache.pivot.*". Please >> register your vote on this issue by responding to this email as follows: >> >> [ ] +1 Change package names >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -0 >> [ ] -1 Don't change package names (specify why) >> >> Upon a positive majority of binding votes and no binding vetoes, we will >> change the package names as part of the 1.3 release. Please submit your vote >> no later than 18:00 GMT on Monday, June 8. >> >> Thanks, >> Greg >> >> >> > >
