Hi Greg, > We actually do need a Bindable base class in order to support binding in > untrusted code. However, if we decide to drop support for that, we could > move the bind() method to WTKXSerializer and eliminate Bindable. Is that > consistent with what you are suggesting? I think yes (but I've never used Bindable, so I can't tell you more in detail) ... or if not to drop it (until the real 1.3 release), why not move in another subproject like the "developer_subproject" (for a 1.2.x) ? You say it can work this way ?
But for the maintenance release 1.2.x containing only the simplification code you said before (for example on Resources and WTKXSerializer), what do you think, with these modifications could it work ? Thanks, Sandro
