Yeah, good point. Ok, I'll revert the changes I made to the 5 or so tickets that were under this umbrella.
-T On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > It does seems a bit odd, but I'm not sure that there is a better > alternative. Also, in those cases, wouldn't we use the "Affects version" > field? Then, you'd see: > > - Add color picker (fix version: 1.3) > - Fix color picker bug (affects version: 1.3, fix version: 1.3) > > which helps clarify things a bit. > > Or, as you said, we could manually remove those. > > > On Aug 22, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > > Ok, I'm willing to just go back to the way we were doing things with >> respect >> to the fix version, with one final question: am I the only one that thinks >> it's weird to have those types of bugs show up in release notes? Imagine >> when we add color picker, and after it's checked in, we find and fix a bug >> in it. Then the release notes for that version will say "Add color >> picker", >> ....., "Fix bug in color picker". >> >> Alternatively, we can just hand-remove these anomalies from the >> RELEASE-NOTES file when it comes time to release. This is probably the >> best >> solution. >> >> -T >> >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> BTW, I think that if we think of "fix version" as "resolve version", it >>> is >>> much clearer. The current naming is unfortunate, but the field is still >>> very >>> useful. >>> >>> >>> On Aug 22, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Greg Brown wrote: >>> >>> Also, I don't like the idea of using "dev" in the version name because it >>> >>>> will make the roadmap more confusing. I like the fact that our users can >>>> (and do) browse the roadmap to see what is ahead. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 22, 2009, at 7:32 AM, Greg Brown wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't see any need to drop use of the "fix version" field. I agree >>>> that >>>> >>>>> "affects version" is confusing, but without "fix version" we can't >>>>> prioritize issues, and the Roadmap feature completely loses all value. >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 22, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Todd Volkert<[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Niclas' 1.3-DEV version is the only real solution I see here, and it's >>>>>> >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> solution that I've seen used before (in VMware). Then, when 1.3 is >>>>>>> released, 1.3-DEV is removed, and all tickets marked as fix for >>>>>>> 1.3-DEV >>>>>>> get >>>>>>> that field cleared. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I was actually thinking of 1.3-DEV being the "Affects" field. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >>>>>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >>>>>> >>>>>> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er >>>>>> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc >>>>>> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
