Yep, you're right. Cheers, Chris
2009/11/3 Greg Brown <[email protected]>: >> But what if I don't want to bind the members of the super-class? > > I am guessing that callers of the single-arg version are likely to want that > behavior. Otherwise, they would call the typed version, since that gives > them more control. > > The untyped version would be for convenience - the typed version would be > for flexibility. > >
