I have removed the feature-level detail. Thanks.
Greg
On Nov 9, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I don't seen anything objectional, nor anything that would require
board attention in the release notes. Personally I'd keep them out of
the board reports, and rather focus on community (that is how the
wicket reports are crafted).
Martijn
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have just posted the Incubator board report for November. Please
review and let me know if you have any questions or concerns:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2009#Pivot
Niclas/Martijn - one thing I did in this report which I had not in
the past was include more detailed information about the contents
of our releases. However, if you think it provides too much
detail, I can either trim it down or remove it altogether. Let me
know.
It is unusual to list the features highlight of a release, but I have
left it unattended. Martijn is more release oriented and could
perhaps
provide better guidance whether to keep it or not.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
