I realized after I sent this that I'd change the Metadata class to provide accessor methods instead of direct access to the field anyway :)
-T On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a good idea - it also get around the problem that the array > elements > > are currently mutable, when we intend for them to be final. Yeah, go > ahead > > and create a ticket for 1.4.1. > > I'm not entirely sure what the context is for this suggestion, but I think > that bit sets are also mutable, so they may not offer that much of an > advantage here. > >
