On Thursday 05 August 2010 17:17:31 Soeren Sandmann wrote: > Brad <b...@comstyle.com> writes: > > > > OpenBSD has had stdint.h for a long time now. Bug 29330. > > > > > > OpenBSD 3.8 is only four years old. That doesn't seem like a long > > > time to me at all. > > > > > > Joonas > > > > Actually going on 5 years old. For us that is ancient. Completely > > unsupported. No one sane would try to build a modern software stack on > > top of such an old release, you'd have to build everything from source > > and run into lots of issues plus its fully of security issues in base and > > ports/packages. > > Is there any real reason to switch to stdint.h? > > inttypes.h is part of C99 and required to include stdint.h, so it > doesn't seem like we'd actually gain anything by switching.
Just drop it. I'm not pushing it that bad. I just don't see the point in worrying about OpenBSD releases 10 releases old which no one uses anymore, nevermind someone trying to build pixman on such an old release for X that didn't use pixman. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
