Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> diff --git a/pixman/pixman-bits-image.c b/pixman/pixman-bits-image.c
> index 4e9ed14..a762c27 100644
> --- a/pixman/pixman-bits-image.c
> +++ b/pixman/pixman-bits-image.c
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,34 @@ bits_image_fetch_untransformed_repeat_normal
> (bits_image_t *image,
> while (y >= image->height)
> y -= image->height;
>
> - while (width)
> + if (image->width == 1)
> + {
> + /* XXX duplication from fetch solid */
> + if (wide)
> + {
> + uint64_t color;
> + uint64_t *b = (uint64_t *)buffer;
> + uint64_t *end;
> +
> + color = image->fetch_pixel_64 (image, 0, y);
> +
> + end = b + width;
> + while (b < end)
> + *(b++) = color;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + uint32_t color;
> + uint32_t *end;
> +
> + color = image->fetch_pixel_32 (image, 0, y);
> +
> + end = buffer + width;
> + while (buffer < end)
> + *(buffer++) = color;
> + }
> + }
> + else while (width)
> {
> while (x < 0)
> x += image->width;
Makes sense to me, but I think the duplicated code should be in a new
force_inline function "replicate_pixel()" or something. Also, maybe the
patch got mangled in the mail, but it looks to me like it uses
eight-space indents.
Soren
_______________________________________________
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
