On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Søren Sandmann <sandm...@cs.au.dk> wrote: > Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> writes: > >> b8r8g8 is apparently no longer supported sometime since this code was >> commented. > > All three patches look good to me. > > If you were benchmarking the over_x888_8_8888() operation, is it still > slower than the general code?
The iwmmxt code paths are slower (40Kops) than generic and ARMv6 (52Kops). Let me dig out those benchmarks and I'll upload it to my fdo webspace. Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
