On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:25:04 -0700 Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:56:53 +0200 > > Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:24:16 +0000 > >> Ben Avison <bavi...@riscosopen.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Missing "lsl" meant that cases with a 32-bit source and/or mask, and an > >> > 8-bit destination, the code would not assemble. > >> > --- > >> > pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h | 4 ++-- > >> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h b/pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h > >> > index 8de060a..da153c3 100644 > >> > --- a/pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h > >> > +++ b/pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h > >> > @@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ > >> > PF add, SCRATCH, base, WK0, lsl #bpp_shift-dst_bpp_shift > >> > PF and, SCRATCH, SCRATCH, #31 > >> > PF rsb, SCRATCH, SCRATCH, WK0, lsl #bpp_shift-dst_bpp_shift > >> > - PF sub, SCRATCH, SCRATCH, #1 /* so now ranges are > >> > -16..-1 / 0..31 / 32..63 */ > >> > - PF movs, SCRATCH, SCRATCH, #32-6 /* so this sets NC > >> > / nc / Nc */ > >> > + PF sub, SCRATCH, SCRATCH, #1 /* so now ranges are > >> > -16..-1 / 0..31 / 32..63 */ > >> > + PF movs, SCRATCH, SCRATCH, lsl #32-6 /* so this sets > >> > NC / nc / Nc */ > >> > PF bcs, 61f > >> > PF bpl, 60f > >> > PF pld, [ptr, #32*(prefetch_distance+2)] > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> this one patch looks like it is independent from the series. > >> > >> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:03:42 +0200 > >> soren.sandm...@gmail.com (Søren Sandmann) wrote: > >> > >> > ================================================================== > >> > 0001: Typo in preload Looks good > >> > ================================================================== > >> > > >> > Looks good > >> > >> Seems like Søren already agreed. Could this one be pushed alone? > > > > Ping? > > > > I know there are lots of patches from Ben in the queue, but this small > > series is the one to be landed first. > > Do you just need someone to push them? Hi, I believe this first patch is totally ready to land, but the others need review (of my reviews). I can try to review some Pixman patches, but since I'm a newbie on Pixman, someone should double-check I'm not talking nonsense and educate me on how we do things on Pixman. That said, I can only offer random drive-by reviews. I don't have a time allocation to promise anything more. Thanks, pq > I'm not capable of reviewing these. > > Since Søren isn't really maintaining pixman anymore I'm not really > sure how to proceed. _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman