On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:23:22 +0100 Ben Avison <bavi...@riscosopen.org> wrote:
> As described in the individual patches, I'm actually suggesting we *don't* > use this approach, since using general_composite_rect seems to increase the > overhead so much that it's no longer just L1 tests that show regressions. > However, I wanted to post these anyway: > a) as a record of having tried and rejected this approach, and > b) because the first patch may still be useful for the SSSE3 fetchers Søren > mentions, or Oded's VMX over_n_8888 case. > > Ben Avison (4): > Expose general_composite_rect outside pixman-general.c > armv6: Add nearest-scaled-cover src_8888_8888 fast path > armv6: Add four more nearest-scaled-cover fast paths > armv6: Add nearest-scaled-cover src_0565_0565 fast path > > pixman/pixman-arm-common.h | 18 +++++++++ > pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm-scaled.S | 4 ++ > pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm-scaled.h | 69 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > pixman/pixman-arm-simd.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > pixman/pixman-general.c | 8 ++-- > pixman/pixman-private.h | 9 +++++ > 6 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > Hi Ben, ok, I'll mark these as Rejected in Patchwork. Thanks, pq
pgpZvJzxcn9UX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
