On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Søren Sandmann <soren.sandm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:25 AM, <spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> >> >> Rename kernel1/2 to reconstruct/sample to match the other functions. >> Rename "scale" to "size" to avoid confusion with the scale being applied >> to the image, which is the reciprocol of this value. >> >> v10: Renamed "scale" to "size" >> > > I don't really agree with this patch. The intention behind the code was > that the integral() function shouldn't know anything about scaling or > images; all it would do was compute integrals over functions, but it > wouldn't know or care what those functions were used for. > Okay will keep the arguments as before. In fact "scale" is used as expected in the old version of the code (larger numbers mean the picture is being enlarged). I still think renaming kernel1/2 to be the same name used in other functions makes things a lot easier to follow.
_______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
