Never mind, I should have just clicked on that rather than thinking it was
a repository name.
I am able to compile your version and run it and the output looks correct.
Changing the plot line to this:
printf ("plot [x=%g:%g] '-' with linespoints ls 1\n", -width*0.5,
width*0.5);
does make it work better, especially for subsample=0, by making the range
stay fixed.
Also if you run it on an older gnuplot that does not understand "pi" you
get a lot of warning messages on stderr.
It would help a *lot* if you added the pulldown to change the type of
filter to the scale demo, so I would recommend adding those patches as
well. Being able to directly compare to NEAREST and BILINEAR helps a lot
with debugging filters. As is I was only able to confirm the handling of
subsample==0 was correct by typing '8' into the subsample field to get a
hi-res filter. subsample=1 produces a quite visible shift that I think is a
good indication the sampling locations will need to be fixed.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/12/2016 01:55 PM, Søren Sandmann wrote:
>
> This series is available as a git repository here:
>>
>> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~sandmann/pixman/log/?h=spitzak-for-master
>>
>
> Not having much luck with that url:
>
> fatal: repository '
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~sandmann/pixman/log/?h=spitzak-for-master/'
> not found
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
