I don’t think the sbcl self-tests passed when I did my build, but I think I pushed the right button and the deb build succeeded anyway. Overall, the build succeeded and I was happy.
I picked version 1.2.1 because it was the most recent version that the SBCL page marked as released for armhf. I tried version 1.2.0, and it had some compilation errors. I didn’t try 1.2.2. I can repeat my build on my board and capture the output if that will be helpful to you. -Austin On Aug 15, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Christoph Egger <[email protected]> wrote: > Christoph Egger <[email protected]> writes: >> Christoph Egger <[email protected]> writes: >>> I have a sbcl installed on my armhf board here (bootstrapping sbcl is >>> fortunately really fun!). Unfortunately sbcl 1.2.2 still fails the >>> testsuite -- once that's fixed I'll upload a sbcl binary for armhf into >>> the archive getting builds started! >> >> Ah wait, it's now building contrib as far as I can tell so should be >> fine. Let's see! > > Actually: > > WARNING! Some of the contrib modules did not build successfully or pass > their self-tests. Failed contribs:" > asdf > sb-aclrepl > sb-bsd-sockets > sb-cltl2 > sb-concurrency > sb-cover > sb-executable > sb-gmp > sb-grovel > sb-introspect > sb-md5 > sb-mpfr > sb-posix > sb-queue > sb-rotate-byte > sb-rt > sb-simple-streams > sb-sprof > Command exited with non-zero status 1 > 0.30user 0.23system 0:00.92elapsed 57%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 6576maxresident)k > 8inputs+144outputs (1major+27873minor)pagefaults 0swaps > make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 1 > > You do not have a fix for these right? > > Christoph > > -- > 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 > Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer _______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
