With attachment this time. On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:37:44PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:46:05PM +0000, Teus Benschop wrote: > > Hi Roberto, > > Indeed, I had not thought of pushing the upstream and pristine-tar > > branches to the remote repository. Those two branches have now been > > pushed > > to the remote, and I expect it now to work fine. I did a quick check > > whether the file "bibledit_5.0.140.orig.tar.gz.delta" exists in the local > > repo, and it does exists there, so now after pushing them, I expect it to > > be okay now. > > Thanks for spotting the issue, and for recommending the fix, and for > > trying to build from Alioth. > > Regards, > > Teus. > > Hi Teus, > > No problem at all on my end. Thank you for getting everything corrected > so quickly. > > There are two additional items that need to be addressed before we can > upload: > > - the debian/changelog causes lintian to complain (see attached) > - we will need a transitional dummy package for bibledit-gtk > > I should have realized earlier that a transitional package would be > needed. Basically, we want to make sure that users don't end up with > orphaned packages on their systems. Right now if someone has > bibledit-gtk installed, when the new bibledit package becomes available, > the user will not see that it is the logical upgrade from bibledit-gtk. > The way to handle this is to add the bibledit-gtk package back to > debian/control and make it depend on bibledit. That will ensure that > the right thing happens. We will need to have that transitional package > in place until after the release of buster, at which time it can be > removed. > > Please make sure that you have tested the install -> upgrade cycle from > the bibledit-gtk 4.9 packages to the new bibledit 5.0 packages. That > will ensure that upgrades work properly for users. > > Also, one additional question: is unstable the intended target for this > upload? Since we are so close to release of stretch, it might be better > to target the first upload to experimental. > > Regards, > > -Roberto > > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez
> _______________________________________________ > Pkg-crosswire-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-crosswire-devel -- Roberto C. Sánchez
N: Using profile debian/main. N: Setting up lab in /tmp/temp-lintian-lab-CN2tjhb1Gd ... N: Unpacking packages in group bibledit/5.0.140-1 N: ---- N: Processing changes file bibledit (version 5.0.140-1, arch source all amd64) ... N: ---- N: Processing source package bibledit (version 5.0.140-1, arch source) ... N: ---- N: Processing binary package bibledit-data (version 5.0.140-1, arch all) ... W: bibledit-data: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 16 N: N: The given line of the latest changelog entry is over 80 columns. Such N: changelog entries may look poor in terminal windows and mail messages N: and be annoying to read. Please wrap changelog entries at 80 columns or N: less where possible. N: N: Severity: normal, Certainty: certain N: N: Check: changelog-file, Type: binary N: N: ---- N: Processing binary package bibledit-dbgsym (version 5.0.140-1, arch amd64) ... N: ---- N: Processing binary package bibledit (version 5.0.140-1, arch amd64) ... W: bibledit: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 16 N: 33 tags overridden (2 errors, 31 info)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-crosswire-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-crosswire-devel
