On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Patrick Goetz wrote:
> It occurs to me that -- in addition to clean up (e.g. getting rid of
> dpatch cruft) it would be a good idea to add a little documentation; for
> example adding this comment:

Yes, it is needed.  And they want us to follow that DEP-3 thing, which looks
very horrible with the dpkg-control-like crap formatting instead of flowed
text with pseduo-headers (like what is used in LKML and git).

http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/

> to 80-kbsd-no-psstrings.dpatch  (which, incidentally should probably be
> renamed 80-kbsd-no-psstrings in order to avoid offending quilt).

Yes.  But it only makes sense to do that as we fix the headers to DEP-3 and
remove the dpatch stuff.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

_______________________________________________
Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel

Reply via email to