On 9/22/2010 7:59 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > We still have Cyrus utils with bad (generic) names polluting the global > namespace. These need to be prefixed with 'cyr', or moved the heck away > from /usr/bin and /usr/sbin and into /usr/lib/cyrus* > > We still have missing manpages, and some utils are not being shipped in > any package (which might be a bug, or not). >
Presumably the only way to find out what these are is to build the binary package and install it? The utility naming thing is really another upstream problem, although I haven't seen a single cyrus utility discussed that wasn't already prefaced with cyr_ > We may need to pull whatever is in CVS and still not released, as the > more active Cyrus developers upstream are focused on 2.4 and other > stuff. > A while back I committed to submitting all the bugs in debian patches I could confirm to the cyrus bugzilla. Now, with 2.4 scheduled to come out in less than 2 weeks it seems like it hardly worth it. I think what I'm going to do in the next couple of days is download the 2.4 source and only submit the bugs which are still in the 2.4 source code. _______________________________________________ Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel
