Your message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:02:04 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464522: fixed in devscripts 2.10.16
has caused the Debian Bug report #464522,
regarding [Pkg-aide-maintainers] Bug#464485: aide-common: bashism in /bin/sh 
script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
464522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.15
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: checkbashisms

Hello Marc and devscripts maintainers,

On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:22:11PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' 
> > package)
> > check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
> > use of a bashism.
> >
> > checkbashisms' output:
> > > possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/aideinit line 129 ('$(< foo)' should be
> > > '$(cat foo)'): if [ "$(< /var/log/aide/aideinit.errors wc -l)" -gt 0 ];
> > > then
>
> That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but
> $(< foo command), which is a valid construct and works at least in
> dash and bash.
>
> May I suggest not using the latest and greatest checkbashisms script
> for mass bug filing until the script has shown to be reasonably bug
> free?

Thanks for pointing that out, hopefully someone will fix checkbashisms.
I'm taking the risk of using the latest checkbashisms because I'm
manually reviewing each and every report I fill. But please note that
I was not aware of that construct being valid (or at least working) so
I filled the report anyway.

There are some other, possible, bugs on checkbashisms on its detection
of kill being called with a numeric value which I'll report as soon as
I confirm it is a bug.

>
> Greetings
> Marc
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
> Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
> Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190
>

Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard.
See http://www.noooxml.org/petition



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: devscripts
Source-Version: 2.10.16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
devscripts, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

devscripts_2.10.16.dsc
  to pool/main/d/devscripts/devscripts_2.10.16.dsc
devscripts_2.10.16.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/devscripts/devscripts_2.10.16.tar.gz
devscripts_2.10.16_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/d/devscripts/devscripts_2.10.16_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated devscripts package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:50:15 +0000
Source: devscripts
Binary: devscripts
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.10.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Devscripts Devel Team <pkg-devscripts@teams.debian.net>
Changed-By: Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 devscripts - scripts to make the life of a Debian Package maintainer easier
Closes: 350307 440957 461653 464522 464787 464976 464984 465264
Changes: 
 devscripts (2.10.16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   The "storm before the calm" release
 .
   * checkbashisms:
     + Correct the $(<) check to not flag $(<foo grep bar) (Closes: #464522)
     + Tighten the $(( / (( regex
     + Modify the ". foo bar" check to allow ". `foo bar`" (Closes: #464984)
     + Ensure that an explanation is provided for the ". foo bar" check
     + Fix the "shell wrapper" regex to allow a space after ; and before exec
       (Closes: #464976)
     + Add posh to the list of supported interpreters. Thanks to Raphael
       Geissert.
     + Warn about use of >& and <& redirecting to a file (POSIX specifies
       behaviour for - and file descriptors only) (Really closes: #461653)
   * debbugs.pm: New module to encapsulate some of the common BTS functionality
     used by various scripts. Currently contains initial support for some
     SOAP methods.
   * bts: Use debbugs.pm for select()
   * tagpending: Fix the bts select call to also handle forwarded bugs
     (Closes: #464787)
   * debchange: Warn if the package appears to have switched from Debian native
     to non-native or vice versa (Closes: #440957)
   * uscan: Don't insist on an upstream version being supplied on the command
     line if one is present in the watch file (Closes: #350307)
   * debuild: Really fix -j, so that --lintian-opts works again
     (Closes: #465264)
Files: 
 033c1fe87834094541b87528f9873651 1224 devel optional devscripts_2.10.16.dsc
 5917080401f6cfa64c4746eb99179409 501068 devel optional 
devscripts_2.10.16.tar.gz
 580f8dfca8bfc246552a74f05bd03204 444112 devel optional 
devscripts_2.10.16_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHsKjTokcE1TReOoURAroYAJoCqXzUVoo825MSJcDkYknZH5hkFQCfVuh4
0gv0XHCqM+8zT8Gb2jXJIhA=
=83t7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to