On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 20:50 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:26:03PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 11:46:10AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > dupload (<< 2.1) [conflict] (>= 2.1) [recommends] > > > > > > sarge has 2.6.3 > > > > Can you please comment on why there is this recommends and in particular > > on why dput is not enough? I tend to consider dupload as obsoleted by > > dput ... > > All buildds use dupload AFAIK. I, myself also use dupload from time to > time and see no real indication of it being replaced by dput > already...
I've taken James's suggestion and re-ordered the alternative rather than removing dupload. > Removing all these obsolete dependency indications is ok. I've removed those I mentioned in my mail (r1418 - r1422). The po4a dependency is satisfiable on etch and above but I've left that for the moment. Adam -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
