Why do we version a lot of our packages as 0.5.11-0.<build-number>? Wouldn't it be a lot cleaner to do:
5.11-79?
I've been playing with new output formats for pkg status (well, now
pkg list) and at least in one of my proposals, this really stands out as
a wart.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
