David Powell wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dduvall/pkg-elfhash/ > > > > is intended to fix bug1615, where we're getting different elf hashes on > > some elf files depending on whether we hash them on sparc or x86. The > > hashes now match on a formerly problematic file, so it certainly seems to > > be fixed. > > > > Quick (but thoughtful) response appreciated. > > Wouldn't which part of the 64-bit sh_size is "top" and "bottom" vary > based on the endianness? Or is libelf doing a partial swizzle?
Nevermind, I got the semantics of the input and output backwards. (Ironically) Dave _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
