Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:13:52PM -0500, Christopher Kampmeier wrote: > > >> Tom, since the "title" is of the same ilk as the "summary" attribute on >> packages, how about referring to the title as "summary" and, similarly, >> using "description" for the optional paragraph description of the image? >> > > Um. An image isn't a package, so I don't really see the reason for using > it as an example. I don't think "summary" makes much sense here. I think > "title", while possibly not perfect, is more appropriate. If you don't > like "title", then maybe "description"? > The title under discussion is playing the same role as "summary" for packages. i.e. A short one liner identifier. Same goes for description. A paragraph or so description of the package or image in this case. So why not use the same terms? Why try to invent something new?
Your response seems to suggest that we shouldn't call the supports of a table or chair a "leg" because us humans already have something called a leg. Chris > Danek > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
