On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dermot and I were also discussing these on sfwnv-discuss in the past > year or so. Expected naming convention is > "application/update/[resource]".
For others that may go hunting, it looks as though the relevant discussion seems to include the following messages: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2007-April/001113.html http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2007-April/001114.html http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2007-April/001115.html http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2007-April/001132.html These messages are confusing to me, as I lack the context to understand why the application/update/info service got pulled. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2007-April/001128.html http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2007-April/001130.html >From that discussion, I also got that an ARC case will be needed. I'll get the one-pager started. I've submitted a request to request-sponsor and will carry on the portions of the discussion not related to IPS at on-discuss. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
