Here's a small example (that's useful to me) that we can use to
   examine the review process, and to start to explore the consequences
   of the "tags and attributes" thread.

   A tool I use occasionally, and would like to use more, is the Alloy
   Analyzer, from MIT's Software Design Group.  It's an executable JAR
   file, so it's pretty easy to deliver, but requires a Java runtime.  I
   don't think we closed on a software classification scheme, but one
   option is to use the freedesktop.org scheme that was mentioned.  The
   package looks like

$ pkg contents -m developer/alloy
set name=fmri value=pkg://contrib/developer/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],5.11-0:20080618T145524Z
license 2cad8d32f2defa4b14b3ec1df11b43eda62943c7 license=alloy-mit pkg.size=1107
set name=description value="Alloy Analyzer"
set name=pkg.summary value="Alloy Analyzer"
set name=info.maintainer_url value=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
set name=info.upstream_url value=http://alloy.mit.edu/alloy4/
set name=info.classification value=freedesktop.org:Development/IDE
set name=authority value=contrib
depend fmri=pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] type=require
dir group=sys mode=0755 owner=root path=usr
dir group=bin mode=0755 owner=root path=usr/bin
file d839d8d728d69e5c462140efa92109d5ddfb8e53 group=bin mode=0755 owner=root 
path=usr/bin/alloy4 pkg.size=3778077

   Comments welcomed.

   - Stephen

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to