> This is my raw prototype (in other words, it has passed make test and > a few of my own personal tests, but it isn't yet polished): > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~swalker/pkg-2022/
Meta-comments from me: * It would be great if we could find another way to pass information about the intent instead of hard-coding in the functions as a string. * Why is the protocol version included in the per-authority image configuration. Would you please explain why you chose to do it this way? * You need to cope with receiving timeouts in the touch_manifest() path now. * Are we guaranteed to get a 501 error when sending this path? I would much rather we get something like a 404, and then fall back to the old protocol. This is going to cause confusion when we introduce content mirrors, since they're actually not going to support catalog and manifest operations at all. In that case, it seems appropriate to return a 501, since the method isn't supported on the server side at all. Whereas in this case the method is implemented, but you can't find what was requested. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
