On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:39:04PM +1200, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 23:07 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > > The important thing to remember is that *a* package is better than *no > > package*. Sometimes users won't have a good build recipe. Those > > packages shouldn't be excluded from availability simply because there > > is not an easily-reproduceable build recipe. > > I think that's a perfectly good reason to be excluded from /contrib. > It's also a requirement of the most commonly used licenses. > I'm not talking about pkgbuild recipes, but some sort of documented > way of building the binaries and access to the sources has to be > a requirement for /contrib to have any value. > I would also make peer review of any code changes a requirement.
That already exists. It's called the SFW consolidation :) _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
