Tom, > The design spec for this feature, as discussed previously on > pkg-discuss, is contained in the issue: > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=856
I really don't think this design is complete. It looks to me like somebody said, "We need an image title." Then the entire property interface was designed around that. It seems like we ought to be able to unify the property space to encapsulate all of the different image configuration options as properties. Aren't authority, filter, image-policy, and mirroring options all properties that are specific to an image? This design just adds another set/unset/<name> triplet which is only going to get worse as we add more features to the configuration. If you put this back, and I follow up with mirroring, we'll have: set-authority unset-authority authority set-mirror unset-mirror set-property unset-property property This isn't a very usable command-line interface. As we add options to the config, it'll only get worse. > webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tmueller/cr-856/ imageconfig.py: -line 111: Use ConfigParser.has_section() here instead -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
