Dave Miner wrote:
> Bart Smaalders wrote:
>> While we complete the "hand-wringing and fretting" stage
>> of 2008.11, I've been giving "fat" packages and optional
>> components some thought.  We have a filtering mechanism, but
>> a simpler and more developer friendly interface is needed.
>> This is a first cut at the problem.
>>
> 
> Seems like a good start at it.  Would elfarch attributes be treated as a 
> variant, and elfbits as a facet, if we wanted to (for example) produce a 
> 32-bit-only image?
> 
> Dave

Actually, the 64bit binaries would be a facet for the x86 variant,
since those are the optional components, but essentially, yes.

- Bart


-- 
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to